I apply for permission to appeal against the decision you have made. The ground of appeal is the following. On the 12 September 2018 I had my first appointment with the district judge in chambers, Maidstone, Kent at 14:00. My Ex submitted a word document with numerous Excuses to cancel the financial order, 99% was dismissed, but the judge latched onto the the MIAM (Mediation Information and Assessment Meeting) comment my ex made. I used my EX MIAM document that was used during out child arrangements order, but before I used it, I send an email to the court asking them if it was acceptable to use, which was sent on the Sent: 14 May 2018 13:27 (Subject: Fw: BV17D05727 - Priority - High Importance) subsequently the order was accepted. If I was informed otherwise, I would have done a separate MIAM. BUT this judge went nuclear, making out if I committed the biggest error in court history, he then started tapping on his recording speaker numerous times, making it clear that he is recording this conversation, so I try to explain and said that I have evidence to back up my statement. He dismissed everything I said, did not even want to see my evidence. Then he cancelled the First Appointment due to this MIAM document. I was speechless, but then I pointed out that my ex failed to provide any financial statement as per court documents request in the First appointment letter. Again, I was totally ignored and all he can talk about is this MIAM. Court meeting was dismissed, and I could clearly see that men should not have opinions in court. Basically, it is totally acceptable for a woman to ignore the law without any consequences, but for a male with evidence, you have no hope in hell for justice to prevail. I provided all the requested information and more, but the judge did not even look at any evidence. I made a complaint afterword, but no one was interested that the court process was not followed.
THIS IS THE ONLINE STATEMENT WHAT THE COURTS STAND FOR AND FUNCTION
The court is a tribunal which can be presided over by a judge, several judges or a magistrate, and is tasked with hearing and giv ing out judgement in civil and criminal cases. It is part of the judiciary arm of the government whose role is to ensure that laws are adhered to or followed strictly. Have the laws been adhered to or followed strictly, NO. I followed all the instructions on the NOTICE OF A FIRST APPOINTMENT, but I been penalised for being a male and outspoken or probably the judge think he is better than everyone else and no one should talk back? My Ex failed to provide any documents (Zero) but according to the “judiciary arm of the government” its acceptable due to that she is a woman. I submitted the financial order again with a separate MIAM. I received a New date, 8 August 2018.
Again, my Ex failed to provide any financial statement, Zero Paperwork for the first appointment on the 8 August 2018. I informed the judge that MY EX failed to provide any financial statement or documents, but I was totally ignored, and the judge informed me that my EX will get everything anyway without even reading any of my documents, statements or seeing any evidence . YOU CAN’T MAKE THIS UP, IT MAKES ME LAUGTH OVERTIME I READ THIS.
The D190 form which is Published 8 August 2015, From:
The notice of the first appointment (Form C) also tells you which other documents are needed. You must file these at the court and serve them on the other person at least 14 days before the first appointment. Both of you should also exchange with each other and the court: • a brief but clear statement of the issues between you; • a chronology (a list of events in date order); • a questionnaire setting out (by referring to the statement of issues) any further information and documents you need from the other person, or a statement that no information and documents are needed; and • a notice stating whether you will be in a position at the first appointment to move on to an FDR (financial dispute resolution) appointment.
Note – The court might make an order for costs against you if you do not follow the deadlines for filing Form E and other documents. None of the above court instructions been followed by my ex, but the judge totally ignored this. I requested that I needs to see any financial Statement, Before We Can Do Anything or decide based on evidence, again, I was totally ignored. I made a complaint on resolver. My ex failed to provide any financial statement or followed any of the instructions on the first appointment. Basically, it is totally acceptable for a woman to ignore the law without any consequences, but for a male with evidence, you have no hope in hell for justice to prevail. I provided all the requested information and more, but the judge did not even look at any evidence. I received a letter from District Judge Wright, making the following false statements, apparently this is acceptable, but totally false and untruthful.
Wait for It, Wait for It, Hold Your Breath. The Judge Says the Following: I Am Quoting What’s Written in This Letter
1: After hearing the partied in person. 2: After consideration of the document’s lodges by the parties. 3: The order was made by the DISTRICT JUDGE on the 23rd January 2019 sitting in a private at a first appointment directional appointment which the court utilised as a financial dispute resolution appointment.
Hold On, I think there is a law relating to lying in court? If anyone lies under oath, they have committed perjury, which is a crime. To clarify, my EX Failed to provide any financial documents, I informed the judge and she ignored me, but it’s ok for my EX to l ie in court and then the judge making false statements on a document. The above statements are totally false and untruthful.
HM Courts & Tribunals Service
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploa... -eng.pdf
DISTRICT JUDGE MAKING THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT, “AFTER CONSIDERING THE DOCUMENTS LODGED BY THE PARTIES
Fact: My ex did not submit any documents, I haven’t seen any financial statement, zero information been shared. How can documents be considered if they were not provided. I even made a statement in court, saying this in the court under oath that there were no documents, no financial statement. Then the following statement was made (District Judge Wright), A first directional appointment which the court utilised as a financial dispute resolution appointment. How is this even possible or legal without any financial statement submitted.
THIS IS THE BEST STATEMENT EVER MADE BY DISTRICT JUDGE WRIGHT
WARNING IF YOU DO NOT COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER, YOU MAY BE HELD TO BE IN CONTEMPT OF COURT AND YOU MAY BE SEND TO PRISON, BE FINED OR HAVE YOUR ASSETS SEIZED.
It should read, if you’re a male, you have no change in hell for justice, but its acceptable if you’re a woman, the law does not apply to woman. These dinosaurs that work in the court with their dinosaurs believes that men and woman is not equal. I felt like I was in a third work country where the man truth statements were totally ignored.
Bias Sexist MAIDSTONE Court Judges
I made numerous complaints via email, resolver online and posted letter to the court, but I wasted my time. All my complaints were totally ignored. At this stage I thought its time to get a sex change to fit in with this corrupt bias system. To Date I haven’t received any financial document from my ex, so if she has a billion pounds or one pound in her numerous bank accounts, no one can know or decide. I provided in detail all my documents, my ex provided zero. I decided to get a solicitor and informed the court to cancel the financial order until the solicitor can resolve these issues. I was totally out of my league. I had no idea what I was doing, and the court judges was walking all over me, believing my ex “word without any documents to back up her statements. I emailed the court again and send letters saying the above, subsequently I was told to complete a D11 form. I completed the form, but due to the ongoing financial abuse from my ex, I could not afford to pay the application fee. The next letter from the judge was brilliant, threatening / intimidating me, saying the following, and I quote. “IF YOU DON’T ATTEND WE WILL MAKE AN FINANCIAL ORDER WITHOUT YOU”
BASICALLY, TO SUM UP IF YOU’RE A MAN AND OPEN YOUR MOUNT, THE FOLLOWING THINGS ARE NOT ALLOWED I (Men) is not allowed to complain about my ex not providing financial documents
I (Men) is not allowed to get a solicitor to help
I (Men) is not allowed to contest the judge decision
I (Men) is not allowed to prove evidence to defend himself
I (Men) can be financially abuse by your ex, that’s totally expectable
My Final Date was on the 10 June 2019
I decided not to attend until I get a solicitor but be respectful and attend on the day and say this to the judge, face to face. That’s was a mistake. After I inform the Judge that I can’t carry on, (1) I need a solicitor, I had no idea what I was doing, (2) I did not complete any document for the days hearing, (3) Again, I haven’t received any documents as per court letter from my ex. This is not the 3de court appearance that my ex did not provide any documents, (4) and I worked the provisos night, so haven’t slept in the last 20 hours. TAKE A WILD GUESS WHAT THE JUDGE SAID TO ME, WAIT FOR IT! The final hearing was going on without all the issues above, I just had to laugh, but I sat through the circus and at the end the judge decided, giving everything to my ex, LOL. Let me give you the list of things a woman can do during a divorce and its legal without any repercussions.
Reasons for Appeal
1: I Was Not Allowed To Have A Solicitor, 2: I Haven’t Seen Any Financial Statement From My Ex, 3: The Judge Did Not Allow Me To Provide My Evidence, 4: The Judge Did Not Even Look At The Evidence, 5: I Informed The Judge That I Haven’t Slept Yet Due To Working, I Only Attended To Be Respectful, But He Ignored Me, 6: Every Statement My EX Made Had No Evince Backing It Up, It Was Only Her Word The Judge Believed, I As Not Allowed To Disapprove It
My EX fraudulently applied for an IVA, I managed to cancel it after providing the correct information My EX made false allegations against me, it took me 2 years to clear. My Wife emptied the UK house when I went to work, this was all my furniture and personal belonging that I bought when I lived alone for 5 years. I paid all my money into the South African Bank Account; my ex removed my name from the joint bank account. My ex wanted a car, but her credit rating was bad, so I bought her a car as per her request, she was the sole user, but when I ask for a divorce, she declined to pay for the car.
My Ex Emptied the UK House Furniture When I Went to Work, This Is What I Came Home To, Called the Police & The Laughed
All My Furniture I Bought When I Lived Alone For 5 Years and Clothes Were Gone when I arrived home at 06:00. All My Personal Items, My Work Pc’s, Hard Drives, Photos
The South African Holiday House That My Ex Sold All My Personal Stuff
Fraudulent Divorce Application (BV17D05727)
I am challenging Bury St Edmunds Regional Divorce Centre to cancel this fraudulent divorce application. My EX fraudulently applied for a divorce without my knowledge & approval. I reported this to her solicitor at the time but was ignored. I have serious c oncerns that more divorce paperwork was fraudulently submitted, and alterations made.
WHY DID MY EX PAY FOR THE WHOLE DIVORCE? THIS WAS MY FORM CANCELLING THE DIVORCE
The Judge’s Decision and My Understanding of Maidstone Court System
Maidstone Bias court system supports domestic abusive mothers against fathers, I’ve been assaulted so many times, I stopped counting, the police just believe woman.
Maidstone Bias Court System Supports Financial Abuse
My ex was so revengeful, that after her false and the police non-stop harassment eventually made me lose my car. I did not owe anyone anyone money and had a perfect credit raising, but when a destructive abusive revengeful ex decides to destroy you, you have zero help from anyone, the government and the police support lying deceiving woman.
Maidstone Bias Court System Supports Theft
All my personal belongings I collected for 20 years and my dead mothers’ photos and gifts were inside our house and removed by my ex, this was mentioned, but apparently, I am not allowed to have any
Maidstone Bias Court System Supports Property Destruction If It’s A Woman
I reported this with evidence, good luck if a single dad expects support from Kent police.
Maidstone Sexist Court System Supports Intimidation / Blackmail
I lost my girlfriend due the ongoing assault and intimidation, MY EX had the support from the police, no evidence needed. After I won all the court cases to clear my name, all these corrupt systems did not provide compensation, I lost all respect for this corrupt system they are trying to say is fair
I Have So Much More Evidence to Submit, But Let’s See If This Justice System Is Going to Be Unbiased & Stop Being Sexist
Dear Judge
I have to point out the following, “this judge, apparently forgot what justice is and what law he must follow when dividing and stop financial abuse.
My ex uses to earn more than me, she is highly educated and can easily get a job in London for more money than me, but she will rather carry on her decide until I am destroyed.
I am just going to COPY AND PASTE a couple of things for JUDGE DRED that thinks he’s above the law.
Section 25 of The Matrimonial Causes Act 1973
On divorce, the aim is to divide the assets fairly. Fairness does not necessarily mean an equal division. What it does mean is that the parties must be left in the position of equal standing and that there must be no discrimination between the respective roles of breadwinner and homemaker, which are regarded as equal.
My EX MOVED IN WITH HER BOYFRIEND, BUT SHE LIED ABOUT THIS IN COURT
In considering need, the Court will always look at the respective incomes and outgoings of each household. This may require a detailed analysis of the budget for each household.
If one or both parties have re-married or cohabit or intend to do so imminently, the Court can consider the new partner's income and resources. If the new cohabitee or spouse is to provide accommodation, then this can have a major impact on the ultimate outcome. If the needs of the divorcing party to be accommodated are met by their new partner's resources, then that party may find it difficult to claim that he needs to be accommodated using the assets of the marriage. This can cause difficulties in cases where the new relationship is short lived or where there is a factual dispute as to whether a party is in fact cohabiting.
The conduct of each of the parties if that conduct is such that in the opinion of the Court it would be inequitable to disregard it ➢ ASSAULT
➢ INTIMATE
➢ FALSE ALLEGATIONS
➢ TRIED TO MAKE ME LOSE MY WORK
➢ FALSIFYING DOCUMENT
➢ THEFT
➢ PROPERTY DESTRUCTION
➢ EMPTIED BANK ACCOUNT
➢ BENEFIT FRAUD
➢ IVA FRAUD
➢ DIVORCE FRAUD
➢ LYING UNDER OATH WHEN MAKING UP FALSE ALLEGATIONS ABOUT CHILDREN TO GET MORE BENEFITS
➢ FALSELY REPORTED BREAKING AND MAKING A FALSE CLAIM
➢ ONGOING CHILD ABUSE
➢ THEFT OF PERSONAL CLOTHES
➢ FINANCIAL ABUSE FOR THE LAST 8 YEARS, I WAS LIVING IN A ONE BEDROOM AND MY EX LIVED IN A MANSION ➢ LOST ALL MY FRIENDS DUE TO HER ONGOING NAME SHAMING AND TELLING LIES
➢ BREAKING AND ENTERING
➢ HER BOYFRIEND ASSAULTED ME
➢ ISOLATING ME FROM MY KIDS FRIENDS
➢ ISOLATING ME FROM BIRTHDAY PARTIES
I used to look after the boys, but it only took her to make one false allegation and then she informed the court that she will collect the kids from school everyday, after court case the kids were placed in aftercare, she changes kids’ school without informing me, the list is ongoing
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1973/18/section/25
If No Financial Information Is Submitted, Then How Can You Make A Financial Decision Based on
What?
We Have A History of Gender and Racial Bias on Our Court That Continues to Undermine the
System. Excluding Individuals Based on Race Is Antagonistic to The Pursuit of Justice
This Is the best Example of a bias judge response, I am the person requesting my personal belongings and my ex also requested things, but the court order response is priceless. The wording in the court order says it all. He could not make it more obvious, the arrogance of a judge that think he’s above the law!
Why does the order may say that both parties oweneach other nothing. The court is on purpose causing ongoing friction. I’ve been a prisoner in my house for the last 7 years.
